I don’t usually get into political crap, but this issue just really annoys me.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s a little confusing and misleading… I can’t see how it could possibly be voted down.<\/p>\n
From http:\/\/ballotpedia.org<\/a><\/p>\n The Ohio Payday Loan Referendum is a veto referendum proposed in order to stop House Bill 545 that would cap the Ohio payday loan industry’s interest rate at 28%. The previous cap was 391% ($15 per $100 on a two-week loan).<\/p>\n HB 545 was approved by state lawmakers and the governor in late spring. Opponents of the new restrictions (mostly the payday lending industry) quickly sprang into action to try to overturn it using Ohio’s veto referendum process.<\/p>\n Opponents of HB 545 are asking for only a partial repeal of House Bill 545; the portion that eliminates the current payday interest rates.<\/p>\n Payday lenders have until September 1 to collect the needed 241,365 valid signatures to qualify for the November 4, 2008 ballot in Ohio.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The payday loan industry is dumping millions of dollars into a campaign against this issue.\u00c2\u00a0 Well of course they are, if isssue 5 passes, they’ll lose millions.\u00c2\u00a0 They’re using every angle:\u00c2\u00a0 Financial freedom, privacy, keep jobs in Ohio, big brother government.\u00c2\u00a0 Their tactics are about as sleazy as their industry.\u00c2\u00a0 Paying homeless people to get signatures, deceased people’s signatures showing up, misleading statements to people signing the petition.\u00c2\u00a0 If you’ve seen any of their commercials on TV, they’re disgusting.\u00c2\u00a0 So here’s the arguments they give on their website:<\/p>\n 1 – To Protect Over 6,000 Jobs in Ohio. 2 – To Preserve Financial Options for All Ohioians. 3 – To Keep Ohioans’ Private Information Out of Intrusive Government Database. 4 – Because\u00c2\u00a0 Short-Term Payday Loans are Cheaper than Alternatives like Bank Overdraft Fees. 5 – Issue 5 is Supported by Out-of-State Special Interest Groups COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) – Ohio has become the epicenter of a national debate on payday lending restrictions.<\/p>\n The payday loan industry is trying to get issues on the November ballot in Ohio and Arizona that would overturn restrictions on the interest rates it can charge.<\/p>\n Uriah King, a policy associate at the industry-critic Center for Responsible Lending, says Ohio’s size and status as a battleground state make it the center of attention for those watching the payday industry.<\/p>\n Fifteen states and the District of Columbia have passed laws restricting the industry, while four other states are watching Ohio to see what happens.<\/p>\n The industry is spending millions of dollars to gather signatures and run television ads to keep restrictions from taking effect.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So yeah, people on both sides from all over the country are active in this one.\u00c2\u00a0 What cracks me up is that there’s really no opposing industry – no one fighting these payday loan predators has a financial reason for doing so. It’s mainly non-profit organizations like Center for Responsible Lending<\/a> and the Vote Yes on Issue 5 Committee<\/a> I don’t usually get into political crap, but this issue just really annoys me.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s a little confusing and misleading… I can’t see how it could possibly be voted down. From http:\/\/ballotpedia.org The Ohio Payday Loan Referendum is a veto … Continue reading
\nReally?!\u00c2\u00a0 What jobs?!\u00c2\u00a0 The only<\/em> jobs I can see threatened are employees of payday loan shops.\u00c2\u00a0 The only way those people lose their jobs is if the payday loan shops get rid of them.\u00c2\u00a0 This issue isn’t forcing them to close their stores, it’s forcing them to stop raping people who use their service.<\/p>\n
\nAgain, Issue 5 is not banning payday loans.<\/p>\n
\nOk, this sounds<\/em> really scary and their ads play on this – “Big brother is watching you and keeping track of your information!”\u00c2\u00a0 The big scary government database is this:\u00c2\u00a0 part of the bill only allows people to use payday loans 4 times a year… the database is used to keep track of that.\u00c2\u00a0 Have you bought any medication containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine lately?\u00c2\u00a0 They scan your ID and make you sign a log because they’re limiting how much you can buy in a 30 day period.\u00c2\u00a0 No one against that measure brought up all these ‘privacy’ issues.\u00c2\u00a0 They’re keeping track of how many times you’ve used the service… that’s it.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nIt may be cheaper than overdraft fees, but I don’t know about ‘other alternatives’.\u00c2\u00a0 For a two week loan, the payday places charge $15 for every $100 borrowed.\u00c2\u00a0 This translates into something like a 391% APR.\u00c2\u00a0 Yes, three-hundred and ninety-one percent.\u00c2\u00a0 As an aside, one of the other things the bill is doing is extended the payback period to 30 days instead of two weeks.\u00c2\u00a0 Here’s my main problem with these places – if I’m $100 behind on my bills this week and use a payday loan… aren’t I going to be $115 behind next time?!\u00c2\u00a0 $130 the time after that… $145 the time after that.\u00c2\u00a0 So cheaper than overdraft fees…well sure.\u00c2\u00a0 But bouncing a check should be an accident, not a short-term loan.\u00c2\u00a0 Do people intentionally<\/em> write a bad check!?\u00c2\u00a0 I hope not, because it doesn’t actually pay your bill and it results in fees.\u00c2\u00a0 So I don’t think you can even compare the two.<\/p>\n
\nHa!\u00c2\u00a0 It’s also opposed by ‘out-of-state special interest groups’\u00c2\u00a0 People in glass houses…<\/p>\n
\nGuess you know how I’m voting on this issue.\u00c2\u00a0 Anyone have a compelling argument for the other side?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"